Print/PDF

Court Of Appeals Finds There Must Be Evidence Of Pre-Existing Condition For Substantial Aggravation Claim To Be Compensable

On June 9, 2014, the 12th District Court of Appeals decided Briggs v. Franklin Pre-Release Center, 12th App. No. CA2013-10-035, 2014-Ohio-2477.  Briggs stands for the proposition that to participate in the workers’ compensation law for substantial aggravation of a pre-existing condition, there must be some evidence the alleged condition pre-existed the injury.  The court wrote: “[such] evidence is crucial because, without any evidence to suggest that Briggs’ T4-7 syrinx existed prior to the workplace incident, Briggs was unable to show that the T4-7 syrinx was substantially aggravated by the workplace incident pursuant to R.C. 4123.01(C)(4).”  Conclusory medical opinions will not satisfy the law.  Click here to read the case.

News

  • Ninth District Court of Appeals Holds Employer Cannot Sue A Provider For False/Misleading Information As To A Claimant’s DisabilityRead more

Events

  • May 6-10 is the 6th Annual National Safety Stand-Down To Prevent Falls in ConstructionRead more

Newsletter Signup

Signup here to be added to receive our quarterly publications Safety Sense, The Employer, and Comp Connection, as well as webinar and event invitations.