Print/PDF

Court Of Appeals Finds There Must Be Evidence Of Pre-Existing Condition For Substantial Aggravation Claim To Be Compensable

On June 9, 2014, the 12th District Court of Appeals decided Briggs v. Franklin Pre-Release Center, 12th App. No. CA2013-10-035, 2014-Ohio-2477.  Briggs stands for the proposition that to participate in the workers’ compensation law for substantial aggravation of a pre-existing condition, there must be some evidence the alleged condition pre-existed the injury.  The court wrote: “[such] evidence is crucial because, without any evidence to suggest that Briggs’ T4-7 syrinx existed prior to the workplace incident, Briggs was unable to show that the T4-7 syrinx was substantially aggravated by the workplace incident pursuant to R.C. 4123.01(C)(4).”  Conclusory medical opinions will not satisfy the law.  Click here to read the case.

News

  • OSHA’s New Respirable Crystalline Silica Rule for Construction is Now EnforceableRead more

Events

  • Robert King Reviews New Workers’ Compensation Legislation at NWOSIA Annual Medical/Legal SeminarRead more

Newsletter Signup

Sign up for our quarterly publications Comp Connection, Safety Sense, and The Employer, receive seminar and webinar information, legal updates, and more.