Print/PDF

Violation Of A Written Work Rule Still Constitutes A Voluntary Abandonment Precluding Temporary Total Disability Compensation

In State ex rel. Booth v. Indus. Comm., 2013-Ohio-5392, a claimant with an allowed workers’ compensation claim was terminated for violating a written work rule prohibiting employees from engaging in direct competition with the employer, which sold cable services.  While on restricted duty, the claimant offered to sell cable to a former employee of the company.  The court of appeals found the claimant’s conduct violated the company’s written policy.  Therefore, the claimant’s termination constituted a voluntarily abandonment from employment, which precluded compensation.  Read the full decision here.

News

  • Ohio Supreme Court Denies Self-Insured Employer Reimbursement of Underpaid PTD Compensation from Overpayment of DWRF BenefitsRead more

Events

  • The Path Forward: Legal & Safety Considerations to Prepare Your Workplace for Return Amid the COVID-19 PandemicRead more

Newsletter Signup

Signup here to be added to receive our quarterly publications Safety Sense, The Employer, and Comp Connection, as well as webinar and event invitations.